Port energy demand model for implementing onshore power supply and alternative fuels

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-7092-2674
dc.authorid0000-0003-0971-5187
dc.authorid0000-0002-2012-6255
dc.authorid0000-0003-1877-8462
dc.authorid0000-0002-5624-1845
dc.authorid0000-0002-9507-9780
dc.authorid0000-0002-6344-6048
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Dogancan
dc.contributor.authorOkumus, Dogancan
dc.contributor.authorCanbulat, Onder
dc.contributor.authorGunbeyaz, Sefer Anil
dc.contributor.authorKaramperidis, Stavros
dc.contributor.authorHudson, Dominic
dc.contributor.authorAllan, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-08T15:15:29Z
dc.date.available2026-02-08T15:15:29Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentBursa Teknik Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractA feasibility study was conducted on the energy and peak power demand of ships for utilising the Onshore Power Supply (OPS) and transitioning to using alternative fuels. The port of Plymouth was adopted as a case study. Four types of ships, Ro-Pax, Tanker, Bulk Carrier and General Cargo, were in operation at the port. A representative vessel was selected for each ship type to simulate the average ship's cargo capacity and engine power. One year of real port operations, including material handling equipment and trucks, were simulated. The peak power and annual energy demand for the OPS system were calculated to be 5.95 MW and 7.1 GWh, respectively. Implementing an OPS system saved 83.6% of total CO2. Fuel volumes were calculated for conventional and alternative fuels, the volume of liquid hydrogen was around 3.5 times that of the conventional fuel, whereas methanol required less mass and volume than ammonia and hydrogen.
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/S032061/1]; Port Authority of Plymouth
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge that the research presented in this study was generated as an outcome of the project funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) with the title of Decarbonising the UK's Freight Transport (EP/S032061/1). The authors also gratefully acknowledge the support of Port Authority of Plymouth throughout the project.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.trd.2024.104432
dc.identifier.issn1361-9209
dc.identifier.issn1879-2340
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85204778074
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104432
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12885/5793
dc.identifier.volume136
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001327551400001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofTransportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzWOS_KA_20260207
dc.subjectMaritime decarbonisation
dc.subjectReal port and ship data
dc.subjectARENA simulation
dc.subjectAlternative fuels
dc.subjectOnshore Power Supply
dc.subjectGreenhouse emissions
dc.titlePort energy demand model for implementing onshore power supply and alternative fuels
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu