Electrochemical treatment of sunflower oil refinery wastewater and optimization of the parameters using response surface methodology

dc.authorid0000-0002-6321-0350en_US
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Swati
dc.contributor.authorAygün, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Halis
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-20T20:09:27Z
dc.date.available2021-03-20T20:09:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentBTÜ, Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractCombined electrocoagulation (EC) + electrooxidation (EO) process was compared with electrochemical peroxidation (ECP) treatment process to treat sunflower oil refinery wastewater. The effect of applied current density, pH/H2O2 dosage, and operation time in the removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), soluble COD, total organic carbon, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were studied using Box Behnken Design. In EC process, decrease in organic concentration was observed as the time and current density increased. The optimized conditions for EC process were achieved at pH 6.07 when a current density of 5.69 mA cm(-2) was applied for 18 min. The EO removed about 90% of DOC at an optimized pH of 5.27 and current density of 11.56 mA cm(-2) when operated for 400 min. The combined EC + EO process was successful compare to ECP process in removing between 90 and 95% of organic pollutant from the sunflower oil refinery wastewater. The energy consumption was calculated to compare between the process efficiency of EC + EO and ECP and found that EC + EO was more efficient process. The reaction rate followed a first order kinetics validated with a high R-2 value (0.96). (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNorth Dakota Water Resources Research Institute (NDWRRI); North Dakota Agricultural Extension Station (NDAES)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by North Dakota Water Resources Research Institute (NDWRRI) and North Dakota Agricultural Extension Station (NDAES). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NDWRRI and NDAES.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126511en_US
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.issn1879-1298
dc.identifier.pmid32208219en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126511
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12885/422
dc.identifier.volume249en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000527935600109en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorAygün, Ahmet
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofChemosphereen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectElectrocoagulationen_US
dc.subjectElectrooxidationen_US
dc.subjectElectrochemical peroxidationen_US
dc.subjectChemical oxygen demanden_US
dc.subjectOrganic carbonen_US
dc.subjectResponse surface methodologyen_US
dc.titleElectrochemical treatment of sunflower oil refinery wastewater and optimization of the parameters using response surface methodologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar